diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 35f75f30..91b56c22 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -972,9 +972,9 @@ By having each user store their own content locally, we can save much larger por
 ArchiveBox differentiates itself from [similar self-hosted projects](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community#Web-Archiving-Projects) by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
 
 <details>
-<summary><i>Click to see the <b>officially recommended</b> alternatives to ArchiveBox...</i></summary>
+<summary><i>Click to see the <b>⭐️ officially recommended</b> alternatives to ArchiveBox...</i></summary>
+<br/>
 
-ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
 
 *If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out [ArchiveWeb.page](https://archiveweb.page) and [ReplayWeb.page](https://replayweb.page).*
 
@@ -984,6 +984,8 @@ ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for s
 
 For more alternatives, see our [list here](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community#Web-Archiving-Projects)...
 
+ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. We encourage you to try these other tools made by our friends if ArchiveBox isn't suited to your needs.
+
 </details>
 
 <br/>